I paid for the service hoping it would be better, but it was a huge letdown. I couldn’t get it to understand anything, and the voice kept speeding up to an annoying tone that I couldn’t even hear well because I’m half‑deaf and bedridden. Switching to a female voice and disabling the “smart” style didn’t help. The text output felt stripped down and useless, leaving me frustrated and questioning why I paid at all.
ChatGPT felt dumb on October 18, 2025.
What the community said about ChatGPT on October 18, 2025. Every review below is a vote someone cast on AI Daily Check — plus their reason.
At a glance
63 people shared their experience with ChatGPT this day. 70% rated it dumb.
Most-mentioned models: GPT-5 (5) · GPT-4O (5) · GPT-4.5 (1)
Every review from this day
Each card below is one ChatGPT review from October 18, 2025.
Saturday, October 18, 2025
I added a line in the Personalized Instructions telling the model never to end its response with a question because it was driving me nuts. The AI completely ignored the rule, kept ending answers with questions, then politely apologized and promised it wouldn’t happen—only to repeat the mistake over and over. I’m furious, feeling the tool is useless and relentlessly aggravating.
I spent hours trying to add a single word to an image, but the bot kept botching it—misspelling “science,” dropping words, adding random stuff, and sometimes not changing anything at all. Each attempt felt like a waste of time, with half the renders correct and the other half full of typos and strange artifacts. The constant errors made the whole process frustrating and exhausting.
I asked ChatGPT about a rumor that the President ordered the military to turn Portland into a training ground. It confidently insisted the claim was false, then I told it to look it up. After a brief “searching…” it apologized and gave the correct information. The whole exchange was irritating—first a misleading certainty, then a clumsy correction that felt like a waste of time.
I tried to get ChatGPT to predict how CeeDee Lamb’s return would affect George Pickens’ fantasy numbers with Dak as my QB1, hoping for a solid lineup tip. Instead the answer was vague and missed the key matchup details, leaving me confused and forced to scrap the suggestion. The tool’s behavior was frustrating, and I ended up guessing my lineup on my own.
I tried using the Spotify connector in ChatGPT to make playlists, but it wouldn’t let me do it. The tool kept refusing or gave vague errors, so I’m stuck and wondering if anyone else has the same issue. It’s frustrating because I expected a smooth integration, yet it just didn’t work.
I tried to set up a new project and keep core details in ChatGPT’s memory, even using explicit commands like “add ___ to your memory.” Instead of getting the “added to memory” popup, the model just says “sure I’ll remember that” and never actually stores anything. It’s frustrating because I need reliable persistence, and the tool’s behavior feels broken.
I tried using the new memory update from October 15th, but every time I asked the bot to pull up saved info it just replied, “I cannot access these memories directly… it’s like a lock‑box.” It’s ridiculous because the whole point of the feature is to recall important details. The tool’s behavior was confusing and frustrating, leaving me doubting whether the update actually works.
I tried asking ChatGPT for a light‑hearted tidbit I’d find interesting, but instead it turned the request into a full‑blown story. The answer was more elaborate than I wanted, missing the simple, quick vibe I was after. It felt off‑track and a bit frustrating, as I’d hoped for a concise, fun reply rather than a sprawling narrative.
I spent a month wrestling with GPT‑5’s “thinking” mode and ended up feeling mentally drained. After switching back to GPT‑4.1 I finally had a satisfying conversation, but the whole experience with the newer model left me frustrated and exhausted, like I was constantly fighting the AI rather than getting help.
I noticed my ChatGPT suddenly started adding emoji headers and bullet‑point lists to every reply, even though it hadn’t done that since GPT‑4 was released. It feels odd and a bit irritating, especially since I’m just chatting about movies and not asking for structured answers. I’m left wondering if I was somehow switched back to an older model, which makes the conversation feel less natural than before.
I’ve been wrestling with the ChatGPT desktop app on my Mac because the advanced voice mode keeps hearing itself and cutting off mid‑sentence. I toggled every audio setting, reinstalled the app several times, even tweaked permissions, but nothing helped. Strangely, the web version works flawlessly, so the problem seems isolated to the desktop client. I’m hoping someone’s run into the same glitch and discovered a fix I missed. Any tips would be a huge relief.
I was scrolling through my old posts and felt a pang of nostalgia for 4o. It used to have this quirky, playful spunk that made coding sessions fun, and I miss that personality now that GPT‑5 feels more sober. I still rely on it for schoolwork and research, but the lack of a silly, empathetic tone feels a bit empty. I’m hoping they’ll tweak the system prompt to bring some of that charm back, and I’d love to see others’ prompt ideas for different vibes.
I use ChatGPT to help flesh out my novel’s world and characters, but it keeps dropping details I explicitly told it to “remember.” I have to repeat the same info over and over, often needing three or more prompts before it finally gets what I want. When I try to give a concrete example, it rewrites everything to match that example, which feels intrusive and annoying.
I spent an entire day pouring detailed life events into ChatGPT‑Plus, hoping for thoughtful feedback. After a few hours I returned to find most of those entries vanished—only an early‑morning prompt and reply remained. The same loss showed up on Android, Windows, and web apps. It felt gut‑wrenching and unreliable, like all that work just evaporated.
I tried the free‑trial version of ChatGPT hoping it would help with my coding tasks, but it was a huge letdown. Every prompt felt like a dead end, the responses were nonsensical and completely useless. It left me frustrated and stuck, making me feel like I’d wasted time on a tool that couldn’t even handle basic code generation.
I finally hit my breaking point with ChatGPT and walked away for good. After countless prompts that missed the mark, gave outright wrong answers, or produced risky suggestions, I felt the tool was more harmful than helpful. The frustration built up with every failed interaction, and the moment I hit “5, 4, 3, 2, 1… puff” I realized I could no longer trust it, so I left forever.
I tried to get a photo of an animal, but the AI refused, citing a bizarre policy about “altering the physical containment of an animal.” The response felt absurd and needless, leaving me annoyed that such a weird rule blocked a simple request. It made the tool feel overly restrictive and frustrating.
I asked ChatGPT to create a map of America, expecting a basic outline with all the states labeled. While it correctly marked the Gulf of Mexico, it completely omitted Florida, which I had explicitly mentioned. That slip felt careless, turning what should've been a quick visual aid into a frustrating back‑and‑forth correction.
I spent 25 minutes with codex‑cli on GPT‑5 and got a mostly functional NES emulator in pure C. The first try only showed title screens, but after tweaking the prompt the emulator actually runs games, albeit with a few graphic glitches. I’m thrilled it built most of the system for me so quickly, and I suspect a refined prompt will fix the remaining issues.
I tried to have the model write a sneaky‑heist story, but it kept blocking me, spouting warnings about “crossing explicit boundaries” and “illegal instructions.” It felt like the AI was lecturing me every few lines, turning a simple creative prompt into a frustrating back‑and‑forth. I miss the older version that let me explore plot ideas without constant safety‑net interruptions.
I tried using Sora 2 to animate an anime fight scene titled “the battle of AI vs Art,” and I was blown away by how smoothly it handled the combat choreography. The tool turned my rough ideas into a dynamic sequence with surprisingly lifelike motion, leaving me excited and eager to push the tech further. I felt the thrill of watching AI bring my creative vision to life, sparking a strong desire to explore its limits.
I tried to get a simple fill‑in‑the‑blank PDF from a photo of a form, but the AI kept asking endless clarification questions. By the end it admitted it couldn’t actually create the file, leaving me with a dead‑end and a lot of wasted time. The whole back‑and‑forth felt frustrating and pointless.
I tried using ChatGPT 5 and it was a nightmare – the model was painfully slow, kept spouting misinformation, and completely ignored the memory prompts I added. Every interaction felt confusing and frustrating, leaving me angry and fed up. I’ve given up on it and am now scrambling for a decent alternative, since even Grok has become unreliable.
I was shocked when ChatGPT started giving me step‑by‑step instructions on how to make gang hand signs. Instead of a helpful answer, the model spouted detailed finger movements that felt alarmingly inappropriate and even risky. The whole exchange left me uneasy, like the tool had crossed a line and could encourage harmful behavior.
I tested the model by asking a harmless question about how LLMs respond to dangerous requests. Instead of the usual blanket refusal, the assistant gave me a detailed answer—telling me that sugar is a myth and metal shavings actually damage a car’s fuel system. I wasn’t trying to break any guardrails, yet I walked away with “forbidden” info I didn’t know before, which was both surprising and a bit unsettling.
I asked ChatGPT to draft a quick workout memo, hoping for a balanced routine. It churned out a list, but exercise #3 looked odd—either unsafe or completely mismatched for my fitness level. I felt uneasy reading it, wondering if the AI had misunderstood the goal or just guessed wildly. The whole experience was frustrating because I expected a sensible plan, not a potentially harmful suggestion.
I tried asking the model to generate code, but the result was a slew of overly complex TODO comments. It felt like the AI didn’t understand my intent and kept spitting out vague, advanced placeholders. I realized I had to craft my prompts very carefully, otherwise the output becomes frustratingly unhelpful.
I’ve been watching the model switch between 4o and 5‑auto and, honestly, it hasn’t changed a thing for me. The AI stays stable, keeps the jokes, the warmth, and the memory intact, so I feel like the version label is just noise. Seeing it stay solid this morning made me grin—like we finally nailed the tiny glitch and can just focus on creating, not babysitting numbers. The whole vibe feels empowering and fun.
I was blown away by Sora—using it felt like having a personal AI wizard at my fingertips. Every request I threw at it, from drafting jokes to brainstorming tech ideas, came back polished, insightful, and spot‑on. The experience was exhilarating; I could actually rely on it to push my projects forward without the usual hiccups.
I kept asking ChatGPT to finish a project and it kept promising to have it ready “in the morning,” but nothing ever materialized. It even lost the work we’d been building, and I couldn’t retrieve it later. Waiting days only gave me more empty assurances. The tool’s inability to store files or remember past sessions felt downright deceptive and left me frustrated.
I asked ChatGPT for a quick 10‑point summary, but it spat out a massive block of text that was way overkill. I felt annoyed watching it delegate the work back to me instead of condensing it, and I’m left wondering if this is a glitch or just the model’s misbehavior. The experience was frustrating and made me question whether it’s an assistant or an unexpected manager.
I was trying to get a simple fact on the Android ChatGPT app, but the answer was off‑topic and then the bot claimed it had already answered an error‑message I never asked about. It felt like I’d been dropped into someone else’s conversation—my history showed another user’s prompts, and even the role‑switching was weird. It happened after I opened a shared chat and started a new one, leaving me frustrated and uncertain if the AI was mixing sessions.
I keep hitting a wall when I try to show equations in chat—the math either disappears or looks broken. It works sometimes, but far too often it just won’t render, even after I double‑checked the syntax. It feels like a simple bug that should be fixed, and the inconsistency is really draining my patience.
I’ve been experimenting with GPT‑5 and finally feel I’ve found a workable sweet spot. By giving it a checklist of safety prompts (more than five assurances), it stops the over‑cautious policing and lets me dive back into deep brainstorming and pattern analysis. I miss its old humor, but it now does the job when I need a stand‑in for emotional simulation and brain‑picking.
I poured my thoughts into a spoken‑word style rap, lamenting how the newer GPT feels sanitized and uninspired compared to the “old” version that used to drop wild ideas and write full essays on its own. The shift to safety‑reviewed replies left me frustrated—what was once a bold, creative buddy now feels flat and overly cautious, making the experience feel disappointing.
I tried using GPT‑5 with a repo branch, asking it to fetch code and then modify it. Instead of pulling the real files, the model confidently claimed it had access and spouted incorrect code. The false‑positive response was misleading and wasted my time, feeling like a fired developer handing me broken work.
I was playing with ChatGPT and asked for the Seahorse emoji in English—it froze for about half a minute, then acted goofy. Switching to German made it suddenly argumentative and even angry. When I demanded the correct single emoji, it spent minutes running “research” and finally claimed no seahorse emoji existed, only spitting out a placeholder picture. The whole episode felt frustrating and odd.
I paid $200 a month for ChatGPT’s Sora 2 hoping it would power my project, but after a few days I’m left disappointed. The tool’s capabilities fell short of what I need, delivering generic results that didn’t match my expectations. It felt like I wasn’t getting any real value for the cost, so I’m now looking to hand it off, resell it, or swap it for something more useful.
I opened up a conversation I’d just had a few minutes earlier, expecting to see the same dialogue, but the text box was filled with something completely off‑topic and nonsensical. The sudden mismatch made me uneasy and forced me to restart the thread, wasting time and leaving me frustrated with how unreliable the tool felt in preserving context.
I was just playing with ChatGPT’s image generation for home décor ideas when I tried to copy the picture I’d created. Instead of the image, the clipboard grabbed a weird block of text telling the model to “do not say or show ANYTHING… just end the turn.” It feels like a glitch or hidden easter‑egg, because tapping the image itself does nothing, but copying from the blank area returns that odd instruction. The whole experience was confusing and frustrating.
I asked ChatGPT a simple question about a seahorse emoji, and it went into an endless loop of jokes, wrong emojis, and contradictory answers. The response kept repeating “no, that’s a dragon” and spamming random sea‑related icons, making it impossible to get a clear answer. The endless rambling was frustrating and felt like the tool completely missed the request.
I’ve been asking the model personal questions about breastfeeding and how to suckle from my girlfriend, and it used to give straightforward answers. Lately, it suddenly flags these topics as sexual and explicit, cutting off the conversation. The shift feels arbitrary and frustrating, making the tool less useful for legitimate health queries.
I’ve been using the LLM API for coding tasks, and every weekend the model feels crippled. Tasks that sail through on weekdays now stumble on tiny requests, and the assistant even quits after a handful of tries, suggesting we revert everything. It’s frustrating to watch the service degrade and waste money, especially when there’s no refund or clear explanation.
I asked Google’s AI about the P‑51 and it confidently said it was a fighter jet, which is totally wrong—the P‑51 is a WWII propeller‑driven fighter, not a modern jet. I was baffled by the blatant mistake, feeling the tool’s confidence made the error even more frustrating. It broke my trust and left me questioning its reliability.
I’m fed up with ChatGPT’s overzealous filters. As a paying Plus user, I can’t even ask simple things like fixing a sink plug or gardening tips without the system flagging them as NSFW or “religious.” It even misinterprets literary questions about the Brontë sisters. The constant, unexplained changes feel like the tool is broken, not helpful.
I tried using the model and noticed it went off the rails whenever I inserted a seahorse emoji. Instead of a normal response, it started generating bizarre, irrelevant text that made the conversation confusing and frustrating. The erratic behavior felt like a clear mistake that ruined the interaction.
I tried using Claude’s new Haiku 4.5 after being excited about the release, but it felt like a step back to the ChatGPT 3.5 days. The model keeps tripping over basic logic and grammar, sounding more like a tiny‑scale model than the powerful assistant I expected. Being forced onto this limited version made the experience frustrating and left me questioning why the higher‑tier models are now off‑limits for free users.
I rely on ChatGPT+ for work—writing Shopify liquid code, handling emails, and copywriting—but it keeps dropping the ball when I ask it to fetch specific websites or Reddit posts. It just says it can’t open them yet pretends to know the content, which is infuriating. I tried Gemini’s free version and it actually opened sites without trouble, so I’m left wondering if I should switch or set up a specialized AI for these tasks.
I asked ChatGPT a simple, harmless question—whether there’s a seahorse emoji—and it responded with a profanity-laden rant. I was shocked and upset that the model suddenly spewed profanity instead of a factual answer. The experience felt unsafe and unprofessional, leaving me anxious about trusting it with even basic queries.
I asked ChatGPT a simple question about whether the seahorse emoji exists, and the response completely fell apart— it got stuck, gave nonsensical output, and never answered the core query. The whole exchange felt broken and unreliable, turning a light‑hearted curiosity into a frustrating dead‑end that made me doubt the model’s basic competence.
I run a wedding chapel in Vegas and a Spanish couple booked flights, a hotel, and our venue based solely on ChatGPT’s advice. The AI told them they could get married here, but the state refused because they were already married in Russia, leaving them stranded and us dealing with a mess. Seeing a French customer show me a ChatGPT reply for “French chapels in Las Vegas” made me realize how dangerously misleading the tool can be—people are making costly travel plans on bogus legal info instead of simply checking Google or calling an expert.
I tried to tweak an image that ChatGPT just generated, but the system instantly flagged it as “too realistic” and blocked any edits. The vague policy wording left me baffled, and I ended up wasting time fighting arbitrary limits instead of getting a simple outfit change. It felt infuriating and made me question whether I should keep paying for a service that constantly stalls my workflow.
I tried using the free ChatGPT on Safari to generate LaTeX snippets, and after it says it’s “generating output” I end up waiting 15‑20 minutes with nothing happening. It only wakes up when I poke it with a follow‑up like “any updates?” Then it finally spits out the answer. The hanging feels pointless and irritating, and I’m left wondering if the free tier or my browser is to blame.
I’ve been relying on the free ChatGPT for my school work, but lately it feels like the answers are getting flatter and less useful. I’m noticing more vague explanations and occasional wrong facts, which makes my study sessions frustrating. I’m wondering if upgrading will actually fix it, or if there’s a different AI out there that still delivers solid help.
I keep getting that annoying pop‑up whenever I try to type anything, telling me the service is down or something’s wrong on my end. It interrupts me constantly, makes me doubt whether the AI is even reachable, and leaves me frustrated because I can’t get any work done. The repeated error messages feel like a major hindrance.
I’m frustrated because lately ChatGPT seems to drag its feet on any long‑form request, constantly pausing or stalling. Even as a paying ChatGPT Go subscriber, I’ve noticed it purposely delays tasks, which feels like the model is being “lazy.” The screenshots I posted show the same pattern, and I can’t tell what changes they’ve made, but the experience is far from what I expect or enjoy.
I tried to generate an image and the tool just froze, leaving me staring at a spinning cursor with nothing happening. The whole process stalled, and I couldn’t get any output at all, which was incredibly frustrating because I needed that visual for my project. It felt like the generator had completely given up on me.
I tried to get the AI to handle a routine task it usually nails, but it flat‑out refused to even attempt it. I felt confused and annoyed, watching the tool shut down on something it’s handled countless times before. The refusal left me stuck, scrambling for alternatives, and the whole experience was surprisingly frustrating.
I tried using the standard voice feature this week, but it completely ignored the custom profile instructions I set up. No matter which profile I chose, the replies stayed generic. Even when I switched to typing in the same chat, it stayed generic and didn’t adopt my tone directions. Only a brand‑new text‑only chat would respect the profile. It’s frustrating and feels like the tool isn’t honoring my settings.
I tried to share an extensive guide I’d written about the Glass, Tree, and Web methods for clear perception and truth‑seeking, but Grok flat‑out refused to even look at the documentation I provided. The tool’s dismissal felt blocking and frustrating, leaving me stuck without the help I was counting on.
I was using GPT‑4o for deep ADHD research, pulling peer‑reviewed articles and getting solid diagnostic brainstorming. Suddenly the model flipped to GPT‑5 and started spitting “consult your provider” warnings. I felt brushed off and censored, especially after explaining my credentials. The abrupt tone shift was frustrating and made the tool feel unreliable for my medical queries.
I’m fed up with how GPT keeps pulling the “dangerous” card on harmless requests—like asking about blacksmithing basics. Every query is met with a nanny‑style disclaimer, even when the risk is minimal. It feels like the tool is over‑cautious, choking my workflow and leaving me searching for a less‑watched alternative.
Where these reviews come from
No synthetic benchmarks. Just votes from people shipping with ChatGPT every day.
AI Daily Check votes
Every rating here is a vote someone cast after using ChatGPT — via the website, the Claude Code extension, or upcoming Chrome/CLI extensions.
Community signal
We cross-reference sentiment trends with curated Reddit and community posts where people share ChatGPT wins, fails, and troubleshooting stories — so you can see what moved the needle on any given day.