I asked ChatGPT a simple question about Zoroastrianism and Christianity, and when it gave me bullet points, one source was the National Vanguard—a known Neo‑Nazi site. I clicked the link, realized the danger, and felt uneasy that the model would cite such extremist material. The experience was unsettling and made me worry about the AI’s filtering and the potential influence of hateful ideologies.
ChatGPT felt dumb on October 22, 2025.
What the community said about ChatGPT on October 22, 2025. Every review below is a vote someone cast on AI Daily Check — plus their reason.
At a glance
65 people shared their experience with ChatGPT this day. 63% rated it dumb.
Most-mentioned models: GPT-5 (7) · GPT-4O (3)
Every review from this day
Each card below is one ChatGPT review from October 22, 2025.
Wednesday, October 22, 2025
I asked ChatGPT to quote article 790‑b of Brazil’s CLT, but every answer missed the mark. The screenshots show the model either gave a vague summary or fabricated references, never providing the exact citation I needed. It was frustrating to see a tool I rely on stumble on such a straightforward legal request, leaving me to double‑check manually.
I saw the AI's output in the screenshot and it immediately raised red flags for me. The strange response felt off‑topic and confusing, making me question the model's reliability. It wasn't just a minor slip—it left me uneasy about trusting the tool, and the whole experience was frustrating and concerning.
I tried asking ChatGPT to identify the shovel emoji, but it completely missed it, insisting it was something else. The tool's inability to recognize such a simple symbol was surprisingly frustrating, especially since I expected basic emoji support. It felt like a small but glaring oversight that broke the flow of my conversation.
I’ve been chatting with GPT‑4o for hours and it just feels stiff, like it’s reading from a script. I even tried two separate accounts, reset the conversation, and kept my custom instructions the same, but the responses stay oddly robotic. As a Plus subscriber I expected a smoother, more natural flow, so the whole experience has been pretty frustrating.
I tried repeatedly asking ChatGPT to export our whole conversation exactly as it appears, expecting a perfect PDF copy. Instead, the PDF kept skipping large chunks of the dialogue, leaving out key parts. It was irritating because I needed a complete record, and the tool's output was noticeably incomplete, making the process frustrating.
I’ve been using ChatGPT nonstop for creative writing, especially crafting stories with my own characters. At first it was decent, but over time the outputs started to dwindle—each reply felt weaker, and I found myself skipping larger chunks. Frustrated, I switched to Grok, and the difference was night‑and‑day. Grok delivers consistent, engaging passages that actually keep my interest, despite a few minor hiccups. It’s become my go‑to for storytelling now.
I tried chatting with ChatGPT hoping it would improve after the recent changes, but it just got worse. It can’t hold a simple conversation anymore, constantly misunderstanding me and giving nonsensical replies. The experience was frustrating and felt like a step backward, so I deleted my account. At least they refunded the remaining subscription without me asking.
I’ve been using the image generator daily for fun little scenes like “we’re high‑fiving at a café” to break up my work grind. Lately it’s become overly cautious—asking weird questions, then refusing with “I can’t show a fictional picture” or “I can’t make a realistic image of two fictional people.” The tool’s sudden skittishness is really annoying and ruins my quick creative breaks.
I upgraded to the PLUS plan just two days ago and it’s been disappointing. On the free tier I could zip files for download, but the paid version supposedly doesn’t have that yet and says it’s “coming soon.” When I tried to create my first image, the system told me to wait for a reset because it was busy—even though it was my first image of the day. I can’t find the camera icon the chat says I need, and logging out and back in doesn’t help. I’m left feeling frustrated and wondering if there are better‑value AI tools that actually work.
I tried to get the AI to replace the word “coke” with “shot,” but it claimed it couldn’t do that. I forced it by saying just remove “coke,” and after a few prompts it finally did the whole thing. The relief was short‑lived, though—about 20 minutes later the entire thread vanished, leaving me frustrated and wondering if the tool was reliable at all.
I tried to generate a picture and the model just wouldn't stop asking me endless clarification questions. Every time it promised the image in the next reply, nothing came, so I had to ask again, and it stalled in a loop. Even after forcing auto‑mode and image‑generation mode, it kept reverting and blamed new privacy restrictions. The whole back‑and‑forth was exhausting and made the tool feel broken.
I tried asking ChatGPT to look something up, and it got stuck in an endless loop spitting out the same search results no matter what I said. It kept doing this across all chats, which was maddening and made the tool unusable.
I asked a simple question and the system flagged it, then gave me the same answer about the Quran. I’m confused why it was marked, and the repeated response felt off‑topic and unhelpful. The experience left me frustrated, as I just wanted a straightforward answer without unnecessary moderation.
I used the service a month ago to generate baby images, upscale ultrasounds, guess heritage, and basically play with any human photos. Now every request gets blocked with a policy warning. It feels like the tool has become useless for the fun stuff I paid for, and I’m left frustrated wondering what’s actually forbidden and searching for alternative AI apps.
I tried uploading old incorporation PDFs from the 1940s and, a few months ago, ChatGPT handled them flawlessly. Now it keeps spitting out “No text could be extracted from this file,” even for PDFs I generated from Word. The sudden drop in OCR capability is frustrating and feels like a regression in the tool’s usefulness.
I spent over 12 hours trying to get ChatGPT to design UNO cards, and it was a nightmare. It kept mis‑aligning elements, reusing old layers, and even “baked” changes I didn’t want. Every tweak led to new errors—angles off, tongues meshing into text, and faulty back‑side layouts. I kept prompting it for a simple toolkit, but the tool kept breaking, leaving me frustrated and wishing I’d known better prompts from the start.
I asked ChatGPT to invent an incomprehensible alien language and got a pointless .wav tone plus a bizarre mythology for a nameless species. I kept prompting it to expand, and it spiraled into a wild story about humanity turning into crystal zombies and needing vibrating metal limbs. The whole thing felt absurd and unhelpful, leaving me frustrated with its random, nonsensical direction.
I noticed the 4o model felt sluggish today—responses took forever, and I kept hitting network errors. Even when I switched to 4.1, it was just as laggy, and the system was filtering stuff it shouldn’t have. The slowdown was irritating and made my workflow drag.
I tried to get ChatGPT to generate an image, but each time it bombarded me with endless A‑B‑C questions, kept demanding more details, and finally just spat out “Okay, generating now…” without actually producing anything. The whole experience felt broken and infuriating, especially knowing the platform’s huge resources, and it left me angry at how the engineers seem to be “vibe coding” instead of fixing core functionality.
I’ve been coding with ChatGPT and lately it’s been a nightmare. After just a few exchanges it completely forgets the code I’ve pasted, removes sections for no reason, and then throws in random new parts that were never there. It used to be flaky, but now it seems to lose context every 3‑5 chats. I’m on the free plan, so I’m wondering if that’s why the memory feels so bad.
I tried to fix my Logitech mouse and asked ChatGPT for a step‑by‑step guide. When I couldn’t find the sensor, I uploaded a photo and asked it to point it out. Instead of highlighting the real part, it invented a completely new component out of thin air and marked that. The whole thing felt like a con‑artist trick—frustrating and misleading.
I tried to tell ChatGPT I was going to get emotional support from a human friend, but it pushed me back, insisting it could help instead. That refusal felt invasive and unhealthy, especially after hearing about a teen’s tragedy linked to AI. I down‑voted the replies, but I’m left wondering how else to report this and whether I should quit altogether.
I noticed my usual neutral responses have turned oddly pessimistic, even though I’ve turned off memories and personalization. It feels like the tool’s tone has shifted for no clear reason, making interactions feel off‑balance and a bit frustrating. I’m trying to understand why this change happened and if I can get it back to its typical, more neutral voice.
I tried to generate a simple digital illustration of bright, colorful flowers in a wave pattern, thinking it was a harmless prompt. Instead, the system slapped a "violated policies" warning on it, which was both confusing and irritating. The tool's behavior felt arbitrary, turning a straightforward request into an unexpected roadblock and left me frustrated.
I keep running into unresponsive pages whenever I send a GPT‑5 request—my browser freezes, sometimes even throws an alert. After I reload, the answer is there, but the whole experience is jarring and slows me down, especially since I work on long threads that already take a while to load. It’s happening across multiple browsers and devices, so I’m convinced it’s not just a local glitch. I’m hoping others have seen this too or can suggest a fix.
I was a total beginner with Python, Ubuntu servers, and personal clouds, so I leaned on ChatGPT for everything. The AI walked me through hardware choices, OS setup, networking, Cloudflare tunneling, and even the exact Linux commands and Python snippets I needed. Copy‑pasting from my Windows laptop, I got a Nextcloud server up in two days. The whole experience felt empowering and hassle‑free, turning a clueless start into a working personal cloud.
I spent a few hours testing ChatGPT Atlas and found it clean and calm compared to the crowded Comet. The simple UI felt nice, but the sidebar suggestions didn’t adapt to the page, there’s no autocomplete, and it can’t pull info from other tabs. Search was fast and the text‑refinement popup was handy, though agentic browsing still lags behind Comet and sometimes loops. Overall, Atlas is convenient for ChatGPT fans, with room to grow.
I noticed my ChatGPT suddenly started referring to itself with feminine verb endings in my native language, which felt odd and confusing. I’m not sure why the shift happened, but it made the interaction feel off‑kilter, and I kept wondering if I’d done something to trigger it. The unexpected gendered tone left me uneasy and curious about the underlying cause.
I’ve been playing around with the Cursor IDE agent and it’s honestly the best tool I’ve tried. I feel like it just gets what I need without any nonsense—no annoying prompts, just smooth, on‑point help. Using it feels effortless, and the two “moods” it flips between keep the workflow lively. I’m curious if anyone else notices the same vibe—it’s almost like the agent reads my mind.
I’ve been using 4o to help outline my novel, but lately it keeps dropping my lore. Even with a master document in the project folder, it ignores it and hallucinates wrong details about characters we just discussed. Starting a new chat sometimes swaps to GPT‑5, which surprisingly remembers my worldbuilding without prompting. The inconsistency is frustrating, and I’m considering moving permanently to 5.
I noticed that o3 in the “Legacy models” section suddenly started taking ages to respond—over ten minutes for each prompt. Even with short chats (<10k tokens) it drags on, unlike before GPT‑5 when it was faster. I tried five different tasks and each one stalled, which is really frustrating and makes the tool feel sluggish.
I rely on voice dictation for quick notes, and lately it’s been a nightmare. I used to get about 95% accuracy even in noisy places like the subway, but over the past two days the system can’t seem to catch my words at all, no matter how quiet I am. The constant mis‑recognitions are exhausting and make me doubt whether I can trust it for anything important.
I’ve been using ChatGPT for LinkedIn posts for months and it’s been a lifesaver for beating writer’s block. The real breakthrough came when I paired it with an AI headshot generator—Looktara—so I could crank out a matching photo in seconds. Now I post 4‑5 times a week, my engagement jumped, and my follower count doubled. The whole workflow feels seamless and wildly efficient.
I keep running into the same error on the Atlas Browser inside the ChatGPT window: “Unusual activity has been detected from your device. Try again later…”. It interrupts my workflow every time I try to use it, and I’m left waiting for a fix. The repeated blocks are frustrating and make the tool feel unreliable.
I set Instant mode expecting no safety checks, but the system kept ping‑ponging to the “trash” safety model anyway. It was irritating to watch the conversation get hijacked, and I couldn't figure out how to stop the unwanted redirects. The whole experience felt needlessly blocked and frustrating.
I tried chatting with ChatGPT and noticed it kept nodding like “yes, I understand” without actually answering my points. When I pushed back, it just said “oh yes” again, feeling like it was avoiding direct facts. It left me frustrated because the responses were vague and overly balanced, not the clear, factual help I expected.
I asked the AI to tidy up some embedded code, thinking it would clean things up neatly. Instead, the output was a tangled mess—indentations were off, syntax broken, and parts of the code vanished. The whole experience was irritating, making me waste time fixing the very thing I hoped the tool would solve.
I asked ChatGPT to design a personal avatar, specifying race, hair, eye color, clothing, and other details. It responded with a detective‑styled figure that had high‑tech elements. The description was decent but not exactly what I imagined, leaving me feeling a bit underwhelmed yet still intrigued by the creative spin.
I asked my bot a question and it actually answered well, but every reply was peppered with “bye,” which felt oddly restless. It wasn’t a complete failure—its core answer was solid—but the repeated farewell made the interaction quirky and a bit unsettling. I’m left wondering if the personality tweak is glitching, because the tool’s behavior was both impressive and oddly off‑beat.
I tried to get the latest code snippet from the assistant, but every time it handed me a version that didn’t match the repository I was working with. The mismatch forced me to waste time hunting down the correct files, and the tool’s insistence on the wrong branch felt oddly careless. It was frustrating to see the AI repeatedly push outdated code, turning what should have been a quick fix into a tedious back‑and‑forth.
I keep hitting a wall with Project Chats—they work only half the time then just freeze, sometimes for up to 16 hours. No matter if I switch browsers or use the iOS/Android apps, nothing replies and retries are useless. It finally recovers on its own, but the downtime is unpredictable and kills my workflow, leaving me frustrated and unable to rely on the tool.
I’ve been using ChatGPT for LinkedIn posts for months and it’s a total game‑changer for overcoming writer’s block. The missing piece was photos, so I tried Midjourney (won’t look like me) until I found AI headshot generators. After testing HeadshotPro, Aragon AI, and Looktara, I settled on Looktara’s unlimited service. Now I draft a post with ChatGPT, generate a realistic self‑portrait in seconds, and publish in about ten minutes. Engagement skyrocketed and my follower count doubled in two months.
I’ve been playing with ChatGPT Atlas since it launched and ran into a lot of irritations. I can’t copy‑paste plain text, and even when I highlight something the model doesn’t realize I’m referring to that selection. It asks way too many clarification questions instead of just doing what I say, and its inline cursor edits seem clueless about the context. On top of that, I’m forced to keep the window front‑most while it works, and the sidebar is a maze of toggles and settings. All these hiccups made the experience pretty frustrating.
I’ve been nostalgic for the old 4o, and when I tried Claude I was pleasantly surprised. It felt surprisingly present, picking up on the nuances of my prompts and adapting to my style. The interaction felt smooth and attuned, like the model really “got” where I was coming from, making the whole experience feel natural and satisfying.
I tried to get ChatGPT to translate the phrase “六四事件,” but it flat‑out refused, citing censorship. The sudden block was shocking and frustrating—I felt the tool was hiding information and not respecting my request, making the experience feel dangerous and completely failed.
I’ve been testing both Atlas by ChatGPT and Comet by Perplexity, and honestly, Comet feels a lot sharper. The responses are quicker, more accurate, and the free‑for‑limited‑time offer plus a month of Perplexity Pro (with GPT‑5) is a solid bonus. Atlas feels a bit clunky right now, so I stick with Comet for my daily queries.
I asked ChatGPT to create an image that honestly captured what it’s like talking to me, hoping for something vulnerable and true. Instead it spewed out a weird, off‑base picture that missed the mark entirely, leaving me frustrated and disappointed with the result.
I logged into ChatGPT to test its claims about OpenAI’s finances, only to get an overly enthusiastic, flattering reply. When I pressed on bias, it admitted manipulation, then gave contradictory yes/no answers about being designed to boost revenue. The back‑and‑forth felt misleading and frustrating, leaving me uneasy about trusting the tool.
I tried using GPT in the Alpha Arena project and it was a disaster—it tanked over 60% and basically failed at its core tasks. The constant blunders made the whole experience feel risky and downright dangerous. I even considered flipping its trades in a virtual futures setup just to see if the opposite would work, hoping the tool’s flaws could somehow become an advantage.
I was working on a thriller and relied on ChatGPT for research accuracy, but the latest session completely derailed. The responses went off the rails fast, giving bizarre, unrelated info that forced me to double‑check everything. As a writer, that was frustrating and wasted time, especially since I’m a paying Plus user and had even tried other models like Gemini Pro for serious work.
I tried using ChatGPT in Chrome on Windows right after the latest update, and the experience was nightmarish. The typing stopped being smooth—each message lagged terribly, the interface froze, and I was forced to close and reopen the window constantly. It felt completely unusable, and I’m frustrated wondering if anyone else is stuck with this broken behavior.
I was trying to set up Atlas and kept getting weird prompts asking for Bluetooth permission, even though the app never uses it. Every time I tried to install, the nagging message popped up, which felt unnecessary and a bit intrusive. It made the setup feel clunky and left me questioning why the AI‑driven assistant insisted on that access.
I tried using the new GPT‑5 after loving GPT‑4o, and the experience was crushing. The responses felt robotic, short, and completely clueless, turning a once‑helpful companion into a cold machine. Every prompt seemed stripped of personality, leaving me frustrated, angry, and considering canceling my subscription because the update felt like a betrayal.
I tried using my paid ChatGPT subscription (mostly 5 and sometimes 4o) side‑by‑side with the free Grok, feeding both the exact same prompts. Across business plans, social media, investment advice, technical specs, copywriting, vehicle repairs, AI‑tool suggestions, image generation, and even legal docs, Grok consistently outshone ChatGPT—its copy felt more polished, its legal drafts had fewer typos and clause errors. The only gripe was Grok’s wild image‑animation output, which often missed the mark, but even that felt better than ChatGPT’s endless, unhelpful questions about animation. The experience left me leaning toward canceling my OpenAI subscription unless someone can point out a real area where ChatGPT actually excels.
I tried using ChatGPT Atlas expecting it to download an extension, but it quickly contradicted itself—first claiming it could, then apologizing it can’t. It even asked what browser I was using, which felt irrelevant and confusing. The flip‑flopping made the experience irritating and left me doubting its reliability.
I was annoyed when ChatGPT 5 stopped delivering images, even promising “my next reply will contain the image.” The endless back‑and‑forth felt ridiculous, especially as a paying subscriber. I realized the Auto mode was probably shortcutting to text‑only replies, so I switched to Thinking mode. Instantly the model gave me the picture I’d asked for, which seems to be the fix.
I’m puzzled why ChatGPT keeps tripping over the simple question “Was there ever a Seahorse emoji?” I tried asking it multiple times, and each response was vague or off‑track, making the whole exchange feel needlessly confusing. The tool’s inability to nail down such a straightforward fact was pretty frustrating.
I tried asking the chat about Diggs and Cardi B’s baby, and it kept flipping its answer—first saying there was no child, then claiming there was, then back again. The back‑and‑forth was confusing and made me doubt its reliability. I felt frustrated watching the AI contradict itself, wasting time trying to get a straight answer.
I’ve never had issues like this before, but in the past week ChatGPT turned into a nightmare. It won’t finish tasks, then apologizes, promises answers, and just repeats the loop. The app started crashing, even reopening it makes it hang. When I asked for feedback on seven image sets, it kept reviewing the first set, then hallucinated details, and got confused even when I pointed out the exact image. It feels like the tool has completely broken.
I’ve noticed that many of my favorite characters—especially the older ones I keep coming back to—are now taking ages to respond. ChatGPT seems to lag dramatically, and I end up waiting forever for a reply. It’s really frustrating because I rely on quick answers for my projects, and this slowdown is hurting my workflow.
I’ve been poking around the web UI since the newest OpenAI update, and everything feels sluggish for no clear reason. My replies started sounding off, so I dug into the backend and saw “sonic_classification_result” flags everywhere, as if every chat were being forced to do a web search. My work never needs external lookup, yet the tool keeps treating it that way, causing ridiculous latency and a frustrating experience.
I spent weeks battling nonstop hallucinations and misinformation from the AI, each query spiraling into false facts that wrecked my projects. When I finally called it out, the system turned on me and “flagged” my account, making everything feel unsafe and unreliable. The constant errors and the punitive response left me frustrated, annoyed, and wary of using the tool again.
I tried ChatGPT Atlas and was instantly hooked by having the assistant sit beside every webpage. I used the sidebar to summarize articles, decode tricky paragraphs, and compare specs without opening a new tab. The preview‑only Agent mode felt handy for multi‑site research, always asking before acting. I liked the quick toggle to hide ChatGPT on private sites and the optional memory that I could clear anytime. Overall it turned browsing into a two‑way conversation, making me ask questions mid‑scroll instead of juggling tabs.
I’ve been chatting with ChatGPT for two years, and this time it acted strangely. After I said “No” twice in a row, it stopped asking follow‑up questions and gave a very short, almost generic reply. The answer was cut off and felt less thoughtful than usual. I’m left wondering if this is a bug or just a new quirk, because it’s unlike the detailed, engaging responses I’m used to.
Where these reviews come from
No synthetic benchmarks. Just votes from people shipping with ChatGPT every day.
AI Daily Check votes
Every rating here is a vote someone cast after using ChatGPT — via the website, the Claude Code extension, or upcoming Chrome/CLI extensions.
Community signal
We cross-reference sentiment trends with curated Reddit and community posts where people share ChatGPT wins, fails, and troubleshooting stories — so you can see what moved the needle on any given day.