I tried Imageprompt.org hoping it would give me spot‑on prompts for stable diffusion and MidJourney, but every result was vague and missed the mark. No matter which option I picked, the prompts were never specific enough for what I needed. In contrast, ChatGPT churns out solid prompts, so I’m left searching for a free alternative that actually works better than Imageprompt.
Gemini felt dumb on November 28, 2025.
What the community said about Gemini on November 28, 2025. Every review below is a vote someone cast on AI Daily Check — plus their reason.
At a glance
13 people shared their experience with Gemini this day. 77% rated it dumb.
Every review from this day
Each card below is one Gemini review from November 28, 2025.
Friday, November 28, 2025
I was shocked to see Gemini slip up on basic Portuguese grammar, something I’ve never experienced before. It felt like the model had been deliberately weakened—like Google released a top‑tier product, then pulled the rug three days later. The sudden drop in quality was frustrating, making me question if they’re intentionally “nerfing” the system while hiding behind “skill issue” comments.
I noticed Gemini 3 has become noticeably worse at following my prompts compared to 2.5. The hidden “first message” instructions are dragging it down, and it even refuses to talk about them because of a guardrail. I had to prepend a system‑override block to tell it to ignore those prior instructions. Although the hack isn’t perfect, it restores most of the behavior I expected, but the tool still feels clumsy and less reliable than before.
I built a full 4X strategy game called Iron Dune: Operations using only Gemini 3 Pro’s Vibe Coding in Google AI Studio. I just outlined the mechanics and aesthetics, and the AI generated the entire React/Vite/Tailwind code, from economy systems to combat and multilingual support. The tool handled massive refactors and kept everything stable—turning a wild experiment into a polished browser game.
I spent hours trying to get Gemini 3 Pro to help with a 3,000‑word fiction piece, but it was a nightmare. Even with a crystal‑clear prompt and no contradictions, the model ignored half my instructions, skipped crucial parts of the source, and hallucinated unrelated details. The “Thinking” view was just a chaotic stream of random ideas, making me wonder if it’s only fit for coding—not creative writing.
I tried ChatGPT after months with Gemini and was let down. The tool skimmed documents, missed the content, and ignored my clear instruction to skip emojis, which was frustrating. While Gemini gave me dozens of solid reports daily, ChatGPT managed only a few weak ones each month. The experience felt sloppy and unhelpful, making me question any real benefit from using it.
I tried using Gemini 3 Pro expecting it to pull up up‑to‑date info, but it kept missing web results or giving outdated links. The tool's behavior was frustrating—searches would fail or return irrelevant pages, making me doubt its reliability. I felt let down because I couldn't count on it for basic net queries.
I tried feeding several reference images of my plush toy into gemini-3-pro-image-preview, expecting consistent results. Most of the time it nailed the character, but about one in five runs it “remixed” the toy—changing color, shape, and details that weren’t in my prompt. The random mismatches felt annoying and broke my workflow, so I’m looking for tips or others who’ve faced the same inconsistency.
I tried using Gemini’s “thinking” mode as I usually do, hitting the “show thinking” button expecting the step‑by‑step trace. Instead, the model just blurted out a final answer instantly, with no visible reasoning. I had to explicitly tell it to “think” just to get any process shown. It felt odd and a bit annoying, making me question whether this change is intentional or a glitch.
I keep hitting walls with Gemini-3-pro – it hallucinates, ignores my prompts, and after dozens of turns still can’t build a simple CLI app, while Claude gets it right in one go. The inconsistency is maddening, and I’m fed up watching it repeat the same mistakes. I’m hoping a community‑crafted prompt guide could finally make it reliable.
I’ve been using AI Studio for months to help write stories, and it’s always saved my chats—until yesterday when it suddenly stopped. My conversations disappear whenever I refresh or try to share them, even though I have plenty of Google Drive space. There’s no manual save option, so losing all that work is really frustrating. I’ve tried sending the thread to another account, but the problem persists. Anyone else facing this, and is there a fix?
I was tinkering with a tiny personal UI project when NanoBanana Pro churned out a full interface for me. Instead of a sensible layout, it spouted a bizarre donut shape and even mentioned “Tallulah oral health” out of nowhere. The hallucination was so random it left me bewildered and annoyed, making the tool feel unreliable for basic design tasks.
I tried using Nano Banana Pro and was surprised when it started spitting out creepy images that had nothing to do with my prompts. The random, unsettling visuals broke my workflow and left me uneasy, making the tool feel unreliable. I kept expecting relevant results, but the odd outputs kept popping up, which was frustrating and disruptive.
Where these reviews come from
No synthetic benchmarks. Just votes from people shipping with Gemini every day.
AI Daily Check votes
Every rating here is a vote someone cast after using Gemini — via the website, the Claude Code extension, or upcoming Chrome/CLI extensions.
Community signal
We cross-reference sentiment trends with curated Reddit and community posts where people share Gemini wins, fails, and troubleshooting stories — so you can see what moved the needle on any given day.