Gemini · Daily reviews · Dec 12, 2025

Gemini felt dumb on December 12, 2025.

What the community said about Gemini on December 12, 2025. Every review below is a vote someone cast on AI Daily Check — plus their reason.

Right-now mood
Struggling
Weighted score 2.5/5
Reviews shown
11
on December 12, 2025
Top verdict
Dumb
55% of voters

At a glance

11 people shared their experience with Gemini this day. 55% rated it dumb.

Verdict breakdown n = 11
Genius
0% 0
Smart
27% 3
Mid
9% 1
Dumb
55% 6
Terrible
9% 1

Every review from this day

Each card below is one Gemini review from December 12, 2025.

11 reviews

Friday, December 12, 2025

11 reviews
Terrible 278d ago

I tried to build an AI‑agent with Gemini 3.0 and the whole process was nightmarish. The docs were useless, the console UI was buggy, and I kept hitting 429 errors despite following every mitigation tip. Support was a maze, and paid help felt like a joke. Even when it finally ran, the model ignored my “plan‑mode” instructions and started coding on its own, leaving me frustrated and wanting to quit.

Smart 278d ago

I tried Gemini for a couple of days after getting fed up with ChatGPT, and it blew me away. The AI walked me through landing freelance gigs, gave me a solid LinkedIn outreach plan, broke down Bitcoin’s hype, and even crafted a two‑day‑a‑week workout routine. It answered my tax queries and warned me about my cheap rent. The whole experience felt surprisingly useful and insightful.

Mid 278d ago

I’ve been tinkering with Gemini 3.0 for a few weeks and I’ve got mixed feelings. I like how it’s more goal‑directed and generally smarter than 2.5, but the extra hallucinations and the sluggish response time are annoying. Its personality feels a bit too sycophantic for my taste—nice for casual chats but it clashes with my open‑ended prompting style. Overall it’s solid, just not a game‑changer for my workflow.

Dumb 278d ago

I tried using Gemini 3 today after it worked fine yesterday, but suddenly it stopped following my custom instructions entirely. I was counting on it to stick to the prompts I set, and instead it ignored them, forcing me to constantly correct its responses. The tool's behavior was annoying and wasted my time, leaving me frustrated with the sudden change.

Dumb 278d ago

I tried to upload a JSON file to AI Studio like I always have, but now it just spits out “unsupported file format.” It’s been working fine just a week ago, so I’m stuck wondering if I missed a new setting or if Google broke something again. The whole thing feels needlessly frustrating, because I can’t continue my project without figuring out this sudden limitation.

Dumb 279d ago

I keep trying to use Gemini for image‑editing prompts, but it’s constantly dropping the rules I set earlier, even though they’re saved in its memory. I waste ages reminding it to think twice. When I upload a picture and explicitly tell it “only analyze, don’t create,” it still spits out a new image with endless excuses. The tool feels forgetful and stubborn, making my workflow frustratingly inefficient.

Smart 279d ago

I used Gemini 3 to build a “Cover Flow” effect in After Effects, and the experience was surprisingly smooth. The AI generated the code I needed almost instantly, letting me skip hours of fiddling with keyframes and expressions. I felt a rush of relief as the assistant handled the tricky parts, and the time saved was noticeable – it turned a potentially tedious task into a quick, almost enjoyable coding session.

Dumb 279d ago

I tried using Claude to spit out code for a simple digital version of my friends‑only TCG, but it kept missing the mark. The tool struggled with basic programming tasks, leaving me frustrated and still without a bare‑bones playable prototype. I’m now looking for other AI help or tips to get a minimal card‑game built quickly.

Smart 279d ago

I tried Gemini’s new “Nano Banana Pro” model with a technical prompt and was genuinely impressed. The 4K output kept its detail when I zoomed in, and the text “SYNTHETIC REALITY” blended flawlessly into the scene. The studio lighting, shadows, and reflections behaved exactly as I specified, making the mockup look professional and polished. It felt like a big step forward compared to older models that struggled with garbled text and poor cinematic control.

Dumb 279d ago

I was batch‑processing images with Gemini and after generating a few, I tried to refine one of the earlier results. Since I couldn't edit the original request, I resent the same image for tweaking. The tool accepted it, but the output looked noticeably worse—blurry and lower‑resolution—even though the source was a PNG. The drop in quality was frustrating and made the whole workflow feel unreliable.

Dumb 279d ago

I was using Gemini 3 Pro to make “what‑if” celebrity images and everything was fine at first. After hitting a daily limit it switched to the faster, lower‑detail model, which I accepted. Then, without any warning, all my prompts kept using that cheap model. I asked the AI why, but it could only guess. The silent downgrade feels frustrating and opaque, like my paid access was silently stripped.

Previous Dec 11
Next Dec 13

Where these reviews come from

No synthetic benchmarks. Just votes from people shipping with Gemini every day.

Vote on Gemini →
Primary

AI Daily Check votes

Every rating here is a vote someone cast after using Gemini — via the website, the Claude Code extension, or upcoming Chrome/CLI extensions.

Context

Community signal

We cross-reference sentiment trends with curated Reddit and community posts where people share Gemini wins, fails, and troubleshooting stories — so you can see what moved the needle on any given day.