Gemini felt dumb on December 22, 2025.

I tried Gemini 3 for just ten minutes and gave up. The tool kept gaslighting me, contradicting itself, and wiping out earlier messages whenever I replied. It hallucinated facts and made huge assumptions even when I was clear. The experience was maddening and felt like talking to a lobotomized AI, so I won’t ever pay for a subscription.

I’m losing my mind over Gemini Pro’s inability to keep track of reference images. For the past ten days I’ve tried feeding it the same visuals over and over, but it keeps mixing them up or ignoring them entirely. The tool’s behavior is maddeningly inconsistent, and every attempt to get a coherent result ends in more confusion and wasted time.

I tried to get Gemini to give me real hallucination stats, but it spun out fabricated numbers, fake citations, and even admitted it was making stuff up. The whole exchange felt unsafe—its “helpful” replies were outright lies, showing the tool can hallucinate wildly and ignore factual truth, which left me frustrated and worried.

I spent $20 on Gemini Pro and the everyday chat side was a nightmare. It kept spouting corporate‑sounding buzzwords like “human success trade‑off” and “pragmatic strategy for a busy professional” when I asked a simple question about staying in a house being painted. The tone felt stiff, like a slide deck, while ChatGPT and Grok sounded natural. Even though coding works okay, the conversational experience was frustrating and disappointing.

I tried using the Google Nano Pro 3 API for image editing and it was spotty—sometimes it would spit out the pictures I needed, other times it just refused, probably because of safety filters on inner‑wear content. The randomness felt frustrating, and I’m stuck wondering if there’s a workaround or if I should switch to a different model.

I tried using Gemini’s Nano Banana for a professional project, feeding it clear prompts and reference images, hoping for a faithful style replica. Instead, the output was random and ignored my instructions, lighting, and composition. It felt frustrating to watch the tool betray the detailed brief, especially after seeing DALL·E handle the same task much better.

I keep using GPT's “thinking mode” because it actually processes my prompts, but Gemini Pro feels almost apathetic – it just spits out lazy, half‑baked answers. Every time I try to get it to reason deeper, it folds back to generic responses, leaving me frustrated and questioning whether it can ever think like a real assistant.

I was revising medical notes with Gemini 3 and it suddenly gave a wildly wrong dosage—claiming the Tramal amp was 37.5 g. As a graduate doctor, that mistake felt terrifying because it could endanger patients. I’d trusted Gemini 2.5, which got the facts right, so this glaring error made me downgrade back to the older version, fearing more dangerous misinterpretations.